This is the final installment of the six-part series on inclusivity in the classroom. Other installments are: A Starting Place, Reflecting on Privileges, Knowing Your Students, Questioning Your Assumptions, and Challenging the Status Quo. You can also read more about the ways our faculty use inclusivity practices in their own classrooms in Inclusivity in Practice.
An inclusive classroom must be built on the foundations of collaboration. When faculty members collaborate with students, they demonstrate their respect for the student experience by giving them a proverbial seat at the table. In theory, many educators would agree that collaborative classrooms are ideal learning spaces.
In practice, however, faculty members (and some students) find relinquishing even some control over the course to be at best uncomfortable and at worst unfathomable. For these faculty members, collaboration might mean starting small:
- polling students on what is / isn’t working in the classroom
- giving students a choice on the format or medium for an assignment
- asking students to be the discussion leader
- providing different options for questions types on an exam
Such gestures demonstrate that the faculty member explicitly respects the students’ learning experiences and understands their unique needs. By establishing this conduit for communication, the faculty member works to bridge the divide between themselves and the students in the traditional classroom hierarchy.
For collaboration to work, it must be woven into the fabric of the course. Collaboration and inclusivity cannot be merely an afterthought or an attempt at ‘good will’ between faculty and students. Instead, it should be communicated to the students as an integral part of the course on par with the learning objectives. There are many ways to communicate this commitment to inclusion:
- include a collaboration statement in your syllabus and assignment prompts
- create an weekly collaboration learning objective
- link assessments to the collaboration learning objective
- build in reflective moments or assignments that ask student to critique their own collaboration
While there are many methods to forefront collaboration in the classroom, I am particularly fond of the co-authoring model wherein the students and faculty member write the course’s foundational documents together. I have found that such methods not only produce a shared learning environment that promotes inclusivity, but also increases student buy-in and accountability in ways that the top-down teaching method does not. Some examples of co-authoring include:
- course policies and course schedule
- classroom ‘bill of rights’ and ‘bill of responsibilities’
- rubrics (or grading criteria) for major projects or exams
- assignment prompts, including requirements
Collaboration in the classroom puts into practice many of the aims of inclusivity: establishing mutual respect, including multiple perspectives, demonstrating awareness of differences, and questioning inherited structures. When we value collaboration, we model inclusivity for our students, and perhaps more importantly, they model it for us.
About the Author
Melissa Wehler, Ph.D. serves as the Dean of Humanities and Sciences at Central Penn College. Her publications include book chapters in a variety of edited collections where she discusses topics including the gothic, feminism, performance, and culture. She also has a forthcoming article on the television adaptation of Jessica Jones and is the co-editor for an upcoming collection on Supergirl. She has published on topics of teaching, pedagogy, and student success and has recently launched an open access resource, The Online Lecture Toolkit, developed to support the needs of educators who want to create effective online video content with co-creator, Judith Dutill. She enjoys teaching classes about writing, literature, culture, and film and has won two teaching awards for her student-centered approach.